Identifying lesions in paediatric epilepsy using morphometric and textural analysis of magnetic resonance images

We develop an image processing pipeline on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) sequences to identify features of Focal Cortical Dysplasia (FCD) in patients with MRIvisible FCD. We aim to use a computer-aided diagnosis system to identify epileptogenic lesions with a combination of established morphometric features and textural analysis using Gray-Level Co-occurrence Matrices (GLCM) on MRI sequences. The model will be validated on paediatric subjects. Preliminary morphometric analysis explored the use of computational models of established MRI features of FCD in aiding identification of subtle FCD on MRI-positive subjects. Following this, classification techniques were considered. The 2-Step Naive Bayes classifier was found to produce 100% subjectwise specificity and 94% subjectwise sensitivity (with 75% lesional specificity, 63% lesional sensitivity). Thus it correctly rejected 13/13 healthy subjects and colocalized lesions in 29/31 of the FCD cases with MRI visible lesions, with 63% coverage of the complete extent of the lesion using supplied lesional labels

裏表紙

\u3cp\u3eCardiac magnetic resonance perfusion examinations enable noninvasive quantification of myocardial blood flow. However, motion between frames due to breathing must be corrected for quantitative analysis. Although several methods have been proposed, there is a lack of widely available benchmarks to compare different algorithms. We sought to compare many algorithms from several groups in an open benchmark challenge. Nine clinical studies from two different centers comprising normal and diseased myocardium at both rest and stress were made available for this study. The primary validation measure was regional myocardial blood flow based on the transfer coefficient (K^{\rm{trans}}), which was computed using a compartment model and the myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) index. The ground truth was calculated using contours drawn manually on all frames by a single observer, and visually inspected by a second observer. Six groups participated and 19 different motion correction algorithms were compared. Each method used one of three different motion models: rigid, global affine, or local deformation. The similarity metric also varied with methods employing either sum-of-squared differences, mutual information, or cross correlation. There were no significant differences in K^{\rm{trans}} or MPR compared across different motion models or similarity metrics. Compared with the ground truth, only K^{\rm{trans}} for the sum-of-squared differences metric, and for local deformation motion models, had significant bias. In conclusion, the open benchmark enabled evaluation of clinical perfusion indices over a wide range of methods. In particular, there was no benefit of nonrigid registration techniques over the other methods evaluated in this study. The benchmark data and results are available from the Cardiac Atlas Project ( www.cardiacatlas.org).\u3c/p\u3